Ni’Hookaa Diyan

Lords of the Earth
Home­Register­Log in
Post new topic   Reply to topicShare | 
 

 NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Goto page : 1, 2  Next
AuthorMessage
Dagon
Guest



PostSubject: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 13:44

The EK would like to extend a conditional NAP with you guys.

Non-Attacking Pact (NAP):
Description:
You're not allowed to: Farm, Spy, Sab, or Steal planets. You are allowed to attack for Naq, if the amount of it is bigger than the specified, but you can't declare war if you go after the Naq. The amounts are specified next to the links of the alliances.

The amount allowed to be attacked for would disscussed... i would recomend something around or over 20b
Back to top Go down
Pride
Special Guest
Special Guest


Number of posts: 763
Age: 16
Location: Victoria, Australia
Registration date: 2007-10-06

Who are you
Life Force:
326272/326273  (326272/326273)

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 14:54

ok im sure we can work around that
Back to top Go down
View user profile
NDCDN



Number of posts: 87
Registration date: 2008-01-31

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 15:56

Over 20bn works
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Dagon
Guest



PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 17:05

Are you guys fine with setting it at 20b then?

if so ill inform my entire alliance.
Back to top Go down
Tek
High Council Member
High Council Member


Number of posts: 388
Registration date: 2008-02-12

Who are you
Life Force:
130/130  (130/130)

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 17:13

makes sense
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Milliardo



Number of posts: 811
Location: In the Deep South enjoying Sweet Tea
Registration date: 2007-10-05

Who are you
Life Force:
20003000/20003000  (20003000/20003000)

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 17:45

Yep....
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.myspace.com/faithdarkened
Pride
Special Guest
Special Guest


Number of posts: 763
Age: 16
Location: Victoria, Australia
Registration date: 2007-10-06

Who are you
Life Force:
326272/326273  (326272/326273)

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 20:23

sure, its 2 way, u can hit us for only 20bil or more, if it is 19,999,999,999 then its unacceptable to farm us
Back to top Go down
View user profile
amandakerk
Special Guest
Special Guest


Number of posts: 366
Age: 18
Location: Kicken it in the land of the free
Registration date: 2007-10-24

Who are you
Life Force:
36003000/36003000  (36003000/36003000)

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 20:45

sure works for me, good day to you sirs
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Grannus
Commander
Commander


Number of posts: 486
Age: 20
Location: Florida, USA
Registration date: 2007-10-05

Who are you
Life Force:
3603000/3603000  (3603000/3603000)

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 22:07

fine with, me, I usually don't come in with about that after only 1 day and I am on more often than that so it is fine with me.

_________________
war is not meant to be fought by pressing buttons, but by people dying so we don't repeat mistakes.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://myspace.com/druidwarrior1989
Dagon
Guest



PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   18th February 2008, 23:47

Okay ill send a message to our alliance members... send one out on your side...
Back to top Go down
Pride
Special Guest
Special Guest


Number of posts: 763
Age: 16
Location: Victoria, Australia
Registration date: 2007-10-06

Who are you
Life Force:
326272/326273  (326272/326273)

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   19th February 2008, 01:01

sweet
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sunol
Special Guest
Special Guest


Number of posts: 274
Age: 17
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia, Earth
Registration date: 2008-02-06

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   19th February 2008, 02:34

Whats the name of the alliance?
............i just wanna know where i can get 20bn lol!
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.myspace.com/sunol
Pride
Special Guest
Special Guest


Number of posts: 763
Age: 16
Location: Victoria, Australia
Registration date: 2007-10-06

Who are you
Life Force:
326272/326273  (326272/326273)

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   19th February 2008, 03:03

u cant just get it ok man ummmmm u can only hit the (eternal knights(the alliance)) if they have 20bil out and u wouldnt stand a chance atm with ur strike action
Back to top Go down
View user profile
NDCDN



Number of posts: 87
Registration date: 2008-01-31

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   19th February 2008, 03:35

Alls well that ends well.

Might be an idea to just set all their alliance to peace and just treat their alliance as one we do not attack no matter how much they have out. That way we will keep relations good with them.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sunol
Special Guest
Special Guest


Number of posts: 274
Age: 17
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia, Earth
Registration date: 2008-02-06

PostSubject: Re: NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities   19th February 2008, 04:44

I know that we can only attack them if they are over 20bn koz i can read the forum. and i know i cant take on somebody with 20bn. i just wanted to know who not to attack.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://www.myspace.com/sunol
 

NAP to formalize the cessation of hostilities

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 2Goto page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions of this forum:You can reply to topics in this forum
Ni’Hookaa Diyan  :: Visitors :: NAPs, FMAs, and General Relations-
Post new topic   Reply to topic