I would like all of your opinions on if this should become our generic treaty wording.

The only condition in this treaty is that my alliance as a whole wishes not to involve itself in a war if we can help it. If we end up allied with one of your enemies, we will not take a side, but we will allow our members to fight with which ever side they wish but they are not allowed to attack eachother. If they end up attacking one of your members durring this war they are open to attack for you and your alliance without any support from the alliance, but it does not mean that the entire alliance is your enemy, for the rest of the alliance will not attack you, but may in fact join you. This is the only stipulation that I will have in any alliance that we are allied with. The only time the entire alliance will go to war is if someone challenges us as a whole, alliance or individual.

please feel free to ask for additional clauses.

ok i already new all this

no one has really given me any input, on whether they wish to see other provisions put into the treaty. I relly need the input so I can have it to the point where it is fool proof and no loopholes and is able to protect the alliance as a whole.

One condition in this treaty is that our alliance as a whole wishes not to involve itself in a war if we can help it. If we end up allied with one of your enemies, we will not take a side, but we will allow our members to fight with which ever side they wish. If they end up attacking one of your members during a war, they are open to attack form you and your alliance without any support from the alliance. This does not mean that the entire alliance is your enemy, for the rest of the alliance will not attack you, but may join you. This is a stipulation that I will have in any alliance that we are allied with. The only time the entire alliance will go to war is if someone challenges us as a whole alliance or individual.

Another condition is war support. If you go to war with someone and ask for our help we will do our best to help. And in return we ask the same.

It would be nice to have the members in our NAP also have a NAP.
(example:DBZ-napEarthSphere-napOZ-napDBZ). That way if a war breaks out we all know who are friends.

Trades. We are active enough to have an "Open Trade" with anyone in our NAP. Outside of that, then maby not.
_________________

sound pretty kool i think, good job milliardo

I thought that was covered, we will give support if they are attacking an alliance that we are not allied with, but we can give none either way if they are both allied with us.

and also, what do you mean by open trade, do you mean members or by the giving someone money and things if they have the whole full supporter status.

dont worry bout FSS for the moment only admandark has it....for now, me and milliardo are next in line

you guys need to know that i can only use it out of perp. so i may have FSS but i cant send you guys anything while i am here

Put that in there to make sure they understood what we ment by attacks and such.....And the trades make a tempting target to get people lured in